The case of Scammell and Nephew Ltd v Ouston is an English contract law case that dealt with the question of when an acceptance of an offer becomes effective under English law. In this case, the Plaintiff, Scammell and Nephew, made an offer to sell goods to the Defendant, Ouston. Ouston accepted the offer by post and the goods were dispatched by the Plaintiff. The question in this case was whether the contract was considered formed when Ouston posted the acceptance, or when the acceptance was received by the Plaintiff. The court held that the contract was formed when the acceptance was posted, as this was the point at which the acceptance was communicated to the offeror and the contract was formed. This ruling established the principle that in cases involving acceptance by post, a contract is considered formed when the acceptance is posted, not when it is received by the offeror. The case of Scammell and Nephew Ltd v Ouston is an important case in English contract law and is frequently cited in discussions of the formation of contracts under English law.

The case of Scammell and Nephew Ltd v Ouston is an English contract law case that dealt with the question of when an acceptance of an offer becomes effective under English law. In this case, the Plaintiff, Scammell and Nephew, made an offer to sell goods to the Defendant, Ouston. Ouston accepted the offer by post and the goods were dispatched by the Plaintiff. The question in this case was whether the contract was considered formed when Ouston posted the acceptance, or when the acceptance was received by the Plaintiff. The court held that the contract was formed when the acceptance was posted, as this was the point at which the acceptance was communicated to the offeror and the contract was formed. This ruling established the principle that in cases involving acceptance by post, a contract is considered formed when the acceptance is posted, not when it is received by the offeror. The case of Scammell and Nephew Ltd v Ouston is an important case in English contract law and is frequently cited in discussions of the formation of contracts under English law.